bot detection model
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Asia > China > Shaanxi Province > Xi'an (0.04)
- North America > Dominican Republic (0.04)
- Europe > Middle East > Malta > Port Region > Southern Harbour District > Valletta (0.04)
- Europe > France (0.14)
- Asia > China > Shaanxi Province > Xi'an (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- (6 more...)
- Information Technology > Services (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Government > Voting & Elections (1.00)
Adversarial Botometer: Adversarial Analysis for Social Bot Detection
Najari, Shaghayegh, Rafiee, Davood, Salehi, Mostafa, Farahbakhsh, Reza
Social bots play a significant role in many online social networks (OSN) as they imitate human behavior. This fact raises difficult questions about their capabilities and potential risks. Given the recent advances in Generative AI (GenAI), social bots are capable of producing highly realistic and complex content that mimics human creativity. As the malicious social bots emerge to deceive people with their unrealistic content, identifying them and distinguishing the content they produce has become an actual challenge for numerous social platforms. Several approaches to this problem have already been proposed in the literature, but the proposed solutions have not been widely evaluated. To address this issue, we evaluate the behavior of a text-based bot detector in a competitive environment where some scenarios are proposed: \textit{First}, the tug-of-war between a bot and a bot detector is examined. It is interesting to analyze which party is more likely to prevail and which circumstances influence these expectations. In this regard, we model the problem as a synthetic adversarial game in which a conversational bot and a bot detector are engaged in strategic online interactions. \textit{Second}, the bot detection model is evaluated under attack examples generated by a social bot; to this end, we poison the dataset with attack examples and evaluate the model performance under this condition. \textit{Finally}, to investigate the impact of the dataset, a cross-domain analysis is performed. Through our comprehensive evaluation of different categories of social bots using two benchmark datasets, we were able to demonstrate some achivement that could be utilized in future works.
- Asia > Middle East > Iran > Tehran Province > Tehran (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 11 > Edmonton Metropolitan Region > Edmonton (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Lazio > Rome (0.04)
- Europe > France (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Overview (0.93)
TwiBot-22: Towards Graph-Based Twitter Bot Detection
Feng, Shangbin, Tan, Zhaoxuan, Wan, Herun, Wang, Ningnan, Chen, Zilong, Zhang, Binchi, Zheng, Qinghua, Zhang, Wenqian, Lei, Zhenyu, Yang, Shujie, Feng, Xinshun, Zhang, Qingyue, Wang, Hongrui, Liu, Yuhan, Bai, Yuyang, Wang, Heng, Cai, Zijian, Wang, Yanbo, Zheng, Lijing, Ma, Zihan, Li, Jundong, Luo, Minnan
Twitter bot detection has become an increasingly important task to combat misinformation, facilitate social media moderation, and preserve the integrity of the online discourse. State-of-the-art bot detection methods generally leverage the graph structure of the Twitter network, and they exhibit promising performance when confronting novel Twitter bots that traditional methods fail to detect. However, very few of the existing Twitter bot detection datasets are graph-based, and even these few graph-based datasets suffer from limited dataset scale, incomplete graph structure, as well as low annotation quality. In fact, the lack of a large-scale graph-based Twitter bot detection benchmark that addresses these issues has seriously hindered the development and evaluation of novel graph-based bot detection approaches. In this paper, we propose TwiBot-22, a comprehensive graph-based Twitter bot detection benchmark that presents the largest dataset to date, provides diversified entities and relations on the Twitter network, and has considerably better annotation quality than existing datasets. In addition, we re-implement 35 representative Twitter bot detection baselines and evaluate them on 9 datasets, including TwiBot-22, to promote a fair comparison of model performance and a holistic understanding of research progress. To facilitate further research, we consolidate all implemented codes and datasets into the TwiBot-22 evaluation framework, where researchers could consistently evaluate new models and datasets. The TwiBot-22 Twitter bot detection benchmark and evaluation framework are publicly available at https://twibot22.github.io/.
- Europe > France (0.14)
- Asia > China > Shaanxi Province > Xi'an (0.04)
- South America > Colombia (0.04)
- (13 more...)